Last Call Karen

To Karen Woodall:

Hi Karen.  The AB-PA Certification seminar is less than a month away at the Westin in Pasadena (November 18-20: Registration).  I’m once again extending a personal invitation for you and your clinical psychologist to attend and become Advanced Certified in AB-PA so you can take the solution offered by AB-PA back to Great Britain and back to the targeted parents there.

The solution offered by AB-PA (The Solution: The Return to Professional Practice; The Solution: The Dominoes) requires that we define the pathology from entirely within standard and established constructs and principles of professional psychology – no “new forms of pathology” proposals.  This means that your continuing to hold on to the inadequate Gardnerian PAS diagnostic model is a barrier to my ability to cooperate with you.  You, however, can cooperate with me, you can join with me in bringing the solution offered by AB-PA to England.

You can add whatever you want to AB-PA.  We just need to establish a ground foundation using standard and established constructs and principles of professional psychology for the professional knowledge required for professional competence.

AB-PA & Gardnerian PAS

The AB-PA diagnostic model leads directly to a confirmed DSM-5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse.  Gardnerian PAS does not.

The confirmed DSM-5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse provides the professional rationale for the child’s protective separation from the pathogenic parenting of the allied narcissistic/(borderline) during the child’s treatment and recovery.

The Gardnerian PAS diagnostic model does not lead to a DSM-5 diagnosis of Psychological Child Abuse and so does not provide any rationale for the child’s protective separation.

The diagnostic model of AB-PA (three diagnostic indicators) provides targeted parents with a confirmed DSM-5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse for the pathology being evidenced in their families.  That is a good thing.

The diagnostic model of Gardnerian PAS (eight symptom identifiers) does not provide targeted parents with a DSM-5 diagnosis of Child Psychological Abuse.  That is a bad thing.

In addition, the categorical diagnostic structure of AB-PA (present-absent) provides the structure necessary to establish a semi-structured and flexibly standardized six-session treatment-focused assessment protocol that can serve as a standard of practice for the assessment of attachment-related pathology surrounding divorce.

The dimensional diagnostic structure of Gardnerian PAS (mild-moderate-severe) does not provide a structured or standardized assessment protocol, and so offers no pathway to a standard of practice for the assessment of the pathology.

By defining the pathology entirely from within standard and established constructs and principles of professional psychology, AB-PA identifies four domains of knowledge needed for professional competence – the attachment system, personality disorder pathology, family systems therapy, and complex trauma – to which ALL mental health professionals can be held accountable

AB-PA activates professional ethical code standards for professional competence (APA: Standards 2.01a & 9.01a; Professional Competence). 

Gardnerian PAS, on the other hand, proposes a “new form of pathology” that is unique in all of mental health, so Gardnerian PAS does not activate professional ethical code standards for professional competence.  The Gardnerian PAS diagnostic model invites professional incompetence in which mental health professionals simply make up whatever they want.  There are no established standards of practice and no ground on which to stand.

The very existence of AB-PA as a second model defining the pathology requires a systems-wide review within professional psychology regarding how “attachment-related pathology surrounding divorce” is assessed, diagnosed, and treated.  Because AB-PA is based entirely within standard and established constructs and principles of professional psychology, it requires that professional psychology integrate these constructs and principles identified by the AB-PA diagnostic model into the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of this attachment-related family pathology.

The constructs and principles of Gardnerian PAS, on the other hand, have long ago been integrated into the approach of professional psychology for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.  Gardnerian PAS simply maintains the status quo.

The world is changing.  The coming professional dialogue will not be about Gardnerian PAS, it will be about AB-PA, it will be about a structured and standardized Treatment-Focused Assessment protocol, it will be about the Contingent Visitation Schedule, it will be about the Key Solution Pilot Program for the family courts.

If you want to remain relevant to the discussion, join us in enacting the solution.  Because if you insist that the ONLY solution is through Gardnerian PAS, then you and your expertise in Gardnerian PAS will fade into irrelevancy.

At some point, I will be invited to come to Europe and provide training and Certification in AB-PA.  I’ve already been contacted about potential European seminars.  I’m agreeable, it’s just a matter of funding my time away from my private practice.  AB-PA Certified mental health professionals will eventually be established in Europe as a defined standard for professional knowledge and professional competence, and the solution offered by AB-PA will eventually be enacted in Europe.  Join me in leading this effort to bring AB-PA to Great Britain.

AB-PA Certification

On November 18-19 I will be providing Basic Certification in AB-PA.  Basic Certification in AB-PA verifies that these participating mental health professionals possess the core knowledge base in the attachment system, in personality disorder pathology, in family systems therapy, and in complex trauma needed for professional competence.  This will be Day-1 of the Certification seminar.

On Day-2 of the AB-PA Basic Certification seminar, I will be covering the structured and flexibly standardized assessment protocol of a six-session Treatment-Focused Assessment that provides the Court with an alternative to an unnecessary and costly child custody evaluation, and I’ll be covering the treatment issues along with the structure and implementation of the Strategic family systems intervention of a Contingent Visitation Schedule which provides the Court with a potential treatment-related compromise solution to the child’s protective separation from the allied narcissistic/(borderline) parent.

In the Advanced AB-PA Certification seminar on November 20th, I will be covering treatment in more depth, focusing on the intersubjective systems of the brain (Stern; Tronic; Shore; Trevarthan; Fonagy) and the misattribution of inner experience (Bowlby; Beck).  I will be describing the deep-trauma meme-structures of the pathogen – the viral code of the pathogen – and the trauma origins of its defensive structures, its inhibition of executive function systems for logical reasoning, its capacity to alter narrative memory structures, its distortions to identity structures, and the implications of its access to motivational networks of the brain.  I will also be extending the pathogen into gaslighting, malignant narcissism, and the terrorist mind.

My goal isn’t to be an “expert” in “parental alienation.”  My goal is to establish a ground foundation for professional knowledge and professional competence that both targeted parents and the Courts can rely on in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of attachment-related pathology surrounding divorce.  My goal is not to to BE an “expert,” my goal is to use the standard and established constructs and principles of AB-PA to extend professional expertise to others.

Conflict Coding System

Also… on Saturday evening November 19th I will be offering an additional brief seminar-ette on the Parent-Child Conflict Coding System.  I’ve decided to work this up into a brief descriptive booklet for my AB-PA Certification seminars (Parent-Child Conflict Coding System). 

I’m going to recommend that all AB-PA Certified mental health professionals provide a Conflict Code as part of the standardized Treatment-Focused Assessment protocol – and I will be strongly recommending that the Conflict Coding System be used by all mental health professionals assessing parent-child conflict for the Courts (all child custody evaluators and court-involved therapists) in order to establish a ground foundation for professional assessment, professional case conceptualization, and professional treatment planning.

I’m a pretty smart guy, Karen.  You’ve seen my 40-page reference list for AB-PA.  That AB-PA reference list is just my reference list for this pathology – and “parental alienation” is not my primary field.  Imagine my reference lists for my primary expertise in ADHD, autism-spectrum pathology, and early childhood mental health (which includes the socially-mediated neuro-development of the brain during childhood).

The Parent-Child Conflict Coding System is a small but power-packed gem.  Good things come in small packages.  I want to get it out there because it will be incredibly useful in obtaining professional competence in the assessment of pathology, all forms of pathology.  It’ll make mental health professionals think – thinking, learning, and growing are always good things. 

Ultimately, though, this Conflict Coding System represents just the bare-bones structure for where I want to take it.  Ultimately, once we solve the pathology of “parental alienation” (AB-PA) – and we will absolutely solve it – then I’m going to be turning to other areas, such as:

The Terrorist Mind:  I will be unlocking the clinical psychopathology of the terrorist mind.  It’s the same core pathogen structure as AB-PA, with different surrounding meme-structures.  I’m already opening that process.  I’m currently in a series on my new blog, The Terrorist Mind, in which I’m unlocking the motivations of the Las Vegas shooter.  I’m thinking that my next series will be on the Manchester Bomber, and then the Paris Shooters.  I’ll probably need a couple of informational blogs in between these series though.

ADHD Solution:  I want to develop a parenting skills training website as part of describing a relationship-based treatment-solution to ADHD.  The regulatory pathology of ADHD has been my primary focus for expertise since I entered clinical psychology.  ADHD is what took me to work for Children’s Hospital of Orange County, because I wanted to work with Jim Swanson at UCI (who was running a collaborative project with CHOC on identifying ADHD in preschoolers).  Jim Swanson is one of the biggest kahunas in ADHD research.  I then moved into early childhood in order to understand brain development with the hopes that if we caught ADHD early enough we could actually cure it, and the early childhood brain development information actually does unlock ADHD.  We actually can cure it using relationship-based approaches if we know what to do.

Developmentally Supportive Psychotherapy:  Also out of the early childhood brain development research and literature comes a new approach to child psychotherapy.  Professional psychology is currently using play therapy (based on Anna Freud and Virginia Axline from the 1950s) and behaviorism (from B.F. Skinner and training lab rats in the 1940s and 50s).  Our child therapy models are absolutely archaic. They incorporate none of the child development and brain neuro-development research that’s occurred in the last 50 years.  We can absolutely solve issues like oppositional-defiant behavior, school behavior problems, family conflict, all that stuff… if we know how the brain works.  This is where I was headed when I became diverted into solving “parental alienation,” which then consumed my focus for the past decade.

And there’s more still.  I’ve got lots and lots of things I want to get to.  I don’t want to be an “expert” in “parental alienation,” I want to create the expertise in others so I can get to these other things before I leave the planet.

Once we solve “parental alienation” (AB-PA), I’m planning on taking the bare-bones structure of the Parent-Child Conflict Coding System and expanding the descriptions for the causal origins identified in the Parent-Child Conflict Coding System into a full Compendium, an magnum opus of my knowledge across ADHD, ODD, and the neuro-development of the brain during childhood (a companion opus to a developmentally supportive model of parent-child psychotherapy).

I just need the time.  If there is any doubt about what my knowledge can do, just look what I’ve accomplished with “parental alienation” – and “parental alienation” isn’t even my primary field of expertise.  And there’s even more about “parental alienation” that I haven’t even talked about yet because I’m waiting for professionals to catch up with the basic stuff.

The Parent-Child Conflict Coding System is just the bare-bones skeletal structure, but even this bare-bones structure has immense value in bringing organizational coherence to identifying the causal structures for parent-child conflict.  In the AB-PA Basic Certification seminars I will be offering an additional seminarette on the Conflict Coding System. 

I don’t care about being an “expert,” nor do I care about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.  The ONLY thing I care about is bringing the pathology of “parental alienation” to an end as quickly as is humanly possible.  Targeted parents and their children need a solution today – now.  AB-PA provides them with that solution, now, today, immediately.

If you join me in bringing AB-PA to Great Britain, the solution arrives sooner and the nightmare for these families ends more quickly.  If you sit on the sidelines of the paradigm shift to AB-PA, then the solution for these parents and their children will take longer.

I cannot join with you because your insistence on holding onto the Gardnerian PAS diagnostic model acts as a barrier to my ability to join you.  The solution provided by AB-PA requires that we return to using ONLY standard and established constructs and principles of professional psychology.  You, however, can join with me.  You simply need to accept AB-PA as the floor-ground of knowledge, and then you can add whatever you want.  Just make the case to professional psychology for your additions, and if professional psychology accepts your “new forms of pathology” proposals – woohoo, yay.  If not, then at least we have the floor ground of AB-PA that defines domains of professional knowledge needed for professional competence and solves the pathology for targeted parents and their children.

November 18-20th at the Westin in Pasadena:

Registration: AB-PA Certification

Less than a month away.  Last call, Karen.  The world is changing.  AB-PA is coming as the primary paradigm for defining attachment-related pathology surrounding divorce. 

AB-PA is a return to the established path of professional psychology.  Join me in creating the solution.

Craig Childress, Psy.D.
Clinical Psychologist, PSY 18857

4 thoughts on “Last Call Karen”

  1. Please!

    We absolutely need you! You’re such a

    Your clout and established presence in advocating for alienated children and parents

    You’re a powerful force Dr.Woodall! Your work is substantial. Your name is powerful because if the work you’ve put in. The change would be revolutionary and would ABSOLUTELY TRANSFORM THIS NARRATIVE. it would be remarkable! Outright research brilliance and worrrkk thst sawbwhst we targwt parents and choldren suffer and resist. Ofteb to lose… itd sjocl and horror. If this wrre to actually hapoen, it would be profound and historicsl… it eould absolutely demolish this horror story problem on all fronts. Could you imagine? It would be in future psych textbooks!

    I miss my daughtees.. abducted 250days .. yada yafa..

    Ive actially overclme the truama becuse of this work.

    Going to this blog everyday and watching those YouTube videos and reading Karen’s blog made me find my footing in reality again. After so much gaslighting coercive control and parental abduction I have developed c-ptsd of course as is the formulaic nature of this pathogen , and I was shocked to see how nobody figured it out. How many times I have gone to stressed to the emergency room to try and ask them for resources because I couldn’t get my lawyer do two outstanding misconduct of my first lawyer. And then I would go to my family doctor and I would go to some lawyers that I knew then I would ask for my ex lawyer to try and make a deal with me because he really failed my children and myself and really neglected so many sections of the Family Law act that pertains to the children’s interests. These are mandated sections that he just didn’t do and then he didn’t file documents on time it was just outrageous and the smoke and mirrors of my ex just grew

    I know that reading all of that stuff from the blogs every day made me dream about being able to use it and how powerful it would be. I started to try and think about ways of how I could bring it into the litigation I asked the custody evaluator on numerous occasions to use it and in his report he said that I asked him to do so but he didn’t do it because it was in “peer review”
    My heart sunk and he had labeled me as my ex. Essentially my ex did a great job of painting me as himself in our own role reversal. This was a giant projective identification and when I was learning about it and that it had already been established I had these moments of disbelief. It was like I was reading and watching about my own casexperience. Our family’s divorce transition narrative was nearly identical to what the clinically established and valid cases of parental alienation/projective identification and coercive control separation abuse,. Ect

    then the custody evaluation report was so incompetent. I was questioning my sanity yet again.. that helpless feeling took over for a day or so

    And then I started laughingetting, because the number of errors and misconduct was so that I could use that report as a platform to bring in my request for the V995.51 assessment.

    THE BOOKLETS literally came at the PERFECT TIME

    It’s come together for me. I’m absolutely positive I’ll get it. All the right “wrongs” are there in misconduct for me to have ever perfect advantage to pursue and absolutely succeed.

    I will use the incompetent custody report and respond to it like a response affidavit. I think that’s going to work becuae it was ordwted by the couet to begin with.. and it is easy to prove how invalid it is, (oerwhelming evidence of incompetence and neglect)

    The judge will have no legal choice but to grant it in the Supreme Court.

    Its APPEALING

    Because its simplentirety and reassuring. It makes the court confident… it’s a yes or no… and that’s awesome.

    If Karen Woodall were to share her gift and status, thetc force would be UNSTOPPABLE
    HISTORIC!
    Dreaming of how cool and substantial and Noble and historical it could be… it would rock this world!

    I’m serious.

    All our social, economic, legal, criminal, and any other problem we face in society and civilization would be greatly and positively influenced or resolved by resolving this pathology

    Ace scores cost billionsavings every year

    I imagine that if someone like Karen Woodall endorced this model, the world would charge drastically making it a vastly different place 100 years from now as compared otherwise.

    This is going to help our species resolve the foundational traumas that permeate society’s worst … in all aspects. If she joined this movement… she’d go down as a catalyst for change.

    Dr Childress’ efforts and outstanding commitment and energy will carry this through without question.. it’s already happened it’s just got out of my can spread.. Spread the word everyone lol

    Karen could make this happen so much quicker for us. And it mattets… cuz

    Tummies full of sorrow

    Ky daugjtera tummies

    And mammas and Babcias too abd every targetted family amd parent

    She’s powerful and this could be huge Fast!

    But it’s up to her… I think she would be a powerful addition to this movement.

    It would be lif mimicking Art

    THE COURAGEOUS coming together for the best of humanity

    Cornyn maybe.. but I see it

    Sorry for typos

  2. Dear Karen, I am a 5-years alienated British father resident in Japan where I teach English and literature. Since the sad passing of the very eloquent and compassionate Dr. Jayne Major, your better-than-most literary skills meant that it is your writing that has done the most to console me. That is a big thing to say. Linda Gottlieb’s family systems expertise has also been very illuminating , Amy’s research interests too, convinced me with evidence the damaged long-term prospects for our kids being abused in this way that we certainly can’t just leave things be and hope everything works out reasonably well in the end. The thing is that like many 100% alienated parents, I have 10 years’ experience of being the very opposite of an abuser. 10-years of scaffolding to support my wife who clearly did not have the mental capacity to bridge from being only a couple, to being a couple with a new baby. I felt very humiliated by Dr. Childress saying (in Foundations) that I was ‘dominated by my wife’! I felt my wife and I were dominated by her ‘mental’ condition. That is about the only discrepancy in the whole book, and even in that I concede that my wife was the proxy through which such domination asserted itself. Please, for the sake of my daughter Emily and the thousands like her, add to your stature by becoming instrumental in getting AB-‘PA’ or Pathogenic Parenting into the DSM. The courts in every country in the world, (not just Japan especially), remain hoodwinked forever by this phenomenon, or else only recognize it when the damage has progressed so far that significant destruction of the child has already taken place. Please don’t allow that. Your court successes with less severe alienation can only be helped by this fixing of the most extreme cases (like my daughter’s). I was so grateful for all your work and speaking. It encouraged me so much at the time. Now though, I think not acknowledging the outstanding thoroughness of Foundations is not a position that has any integrity.
    Thanks, RB.

  3. C’mon Karen, do it for all of us suffering deeply as well as those assuredly to still come from this very REAL pathology wreaking havoc on so many lives & families- with no other sound and proven SOLUTION available to us! We’ve all done it ‘your way’- the same old hopeless, indifferent path that predictably ad nauseum provides NO SOLUTION! Dr Childress has nailed this REALITY we live day to day on the head and provided the sound & solid foundation, materials and all the in plain site backup to take it forward. Do not let us, our children and families down letting this vicious, unfeeling, uncaring & malignant destruction that steals, kills, destroys & can last lifetimes, or cut them short so unmercifully and unfairly continue another day. WE NEED HELP! AND WE NEED YOU!

  4. Why call out a colleague personally in such a public manner? Dr. Childress, your work is so important in general, and also to many of your readers (including me) in such an intensely personal way. The approach to others in the field who do not yet see eye-to-eye with you (and I desperately wish they would) is starting to remind me of political arguments on Facebook or other forums, where when one is called out directly, they tend to dig their heels in even further, where debate and discussion shuts down. I desperately wish some of this confrontational approach would change: I think it may potentially slow the progress in your work, which is so important to many of your followers (including me).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s